NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Leiper v R [2018] NSWCCA 117 Hearing dates: 4 June 2018 Date of orders: 08 June 2018 Decision date: 08 June 2018 Before: Leeming JA; Bellew J; Wilson J Decision: Leave to appeal is refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – stay of proceedings – accused charged with unlawfully killing his disabled daughter – police investigation produced 370 hours of sound recordings from listening device – none of recordings incriminated accused – recordings all disclosed to accused in 2016 – Legal Aid unwilling to pay for lawyers to listen to recordings – Crown unwilling to provide transcripts – trial judge refused to grant stay pending provision of transcripts – whether leave should be granted to appeal from refusal to grant stay – where insufficient prospects of success – where allowing appeal would likely result in vacating the trial – leave refused Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 18 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5F Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW), r 5B Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), ss 141, 142 Cases Cited: R v Seller; R v McCarthy (2015) 89 NSWLR 155; [2015] NSWCCA 76 Category: Principal judgment Parties: David Alexander Leiper (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: BW Walker SC, M Fokkes (Applicant) N Adams (Respondent)
Solicitors: Legal Aid NSW (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2014/51774 Publication restriction: Judgment will not be published on Caselaw until conclusion of trial. Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Criminal Citation: Nil Date of Decision: 25 September 2017 Before: His Honour Judge Ellis DCJ File Number(s): 2014/51774
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate