NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Chinatex (Australia) Pty Limited v Bindaree Beef Pty Limited [2018] NSWCA 126 Hearing dates: 9 May 2018 Decision date: 13 June 2018 Before: McColl JA at [1]; White JA at [2]; Barrett AJA at [4] Decision: 1. Appeal dismissed. 2. That the appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal. Catchwords: CONTRACTS – fixed term "service kill agreement" between abattoir and customer – various issues of construction thereof – whether abattoir had right to terminate upon customer's failure to perform – whether the customer's failure to perform caused the abattoir to lose the benefit of the contract for the balance of its term.
CONTRACTS – frustration – whether fixed term "service kill agreement" frustrated by failure of a stranger to the contract to buy the total output from the customer.
FORMS OF ACTION – action in debt – action for unliquidated damages.
DAMAGES – damages for breach of contract – assessment of loss of profit damages. Cases Cited: Automatic Fire Sprinklers Pty Ltd v Watson (1946) 72 CLR 435; [1946] HCA 25 Bindaree Beef Pty Ltd v Chinatex (Australia) Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 1615 Brisbane City Council v Group Projects Pty Ltd (1979) 145 CLR 143; [1979] HCA 54 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority (NSW) (1982) 149 CLR 337; [1982] HCA 24 Commonwealth v Amman Aviation Pty Ltd (1991) 174 CLR 64; [1991] HCA 54 Cort v Ambergate, Boston & Eastern Railway Co (1851) 17 QB 127 at 148; 117 ER 1229 Davis Contractors Ltd v Fareham Urban District Council [1956] AC 696 DTR Nominees Pty Ltd v Mona Homes Pty Ltd (1978) 138 CLR 423; [1978] HCA 12 Ecosse Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Gee Dee Nominees Pty Ltd [2017] HCA 12; (2017) 91 ALJR 486 Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd (2014) 251 CLR 640; [2014] HCA 7 Krell v Henry [1903] 2 KB 740 Larrinaga v Société Franco-Americaine des Phosphates (1922) 29 Com Cas 1 oOh! Media Roadside Pty Ltd v Diamond Wheels Pty Ltd (2011) 32 VR 255; [2011] VSCA 116 Peter Turnbull & Co Pty Ltd v Mundus Trading Co (Australasia) Pty Ltd (1954) 90 CLR 235; [1954] HCA 25 Psaltis v Schultz (1948) 76 CLR 547; [1948] HCA 31 Robinson v Harman: (1848) 1 Ex 850; 154 ER 363 Scanlan's New Neon Ltd v Toohey's Ltd (1943) 67 CLR 169; [1943] HCA 43 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Chinatex (Australia) Pty Limited (Appellant) Bindaree Beef Pty Limited (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr MLD Einfeld QC / Mr D Krochmalik (Appellant) Mr IM Jackman SC / Mr TW Marskell (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate