NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Clearstate Development Co Pty Ltd v Liverpool City Council [2018] NSWLEC 1279 Hearing dates: 7, 8, 9 March 2018 and written submissions on 13 March 2018 Date of orders: 13 June 2018 Decision date: 13 June 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dixon SC Decision: The final orders of the Court are: (1) Appeal upheld. (2) A subdivision certificate for 150 Tenth Avenue, Austral NSW 2179 (Lot 885 DP 2475 and Lot 860 DP 2475) pursuant to Development Consent no DA 1205/2015 dated 21 June 2016 is issued under Part 4 A Division 1 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. (3) The Respondent is directed to sign a subdivision certificate in relation to the Applicant's subdivision plan and the accompanying s88B instrument, and provide these documents to the Applicant within 1 business day. (4) The Exhibits are returned apart from D, G, 7 and 8. Catchwords: APPEAL: Subdivision certificate – Construction and interpretation of development consent Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act State Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Region Growth Centre) 2006 Sydney Water Act 1994 Cases Cited: Auburn Municipal Council v Szabo (1971) 67 LGRA 427 Gibson v Mosman MC (2001) 1114 LGERA 416 Howarth v Gosford City Council (No 2) (2014) 204 LGERA 425 Kindimindi Investments Pty Ltd v Lane Cove Council (2006) 143 LGERA 277 Lake Macquarie City Council v Australian native Landscapes Pty Ltd (No 1) [2015] NSWLEC 114 Mison v Randwick Municipal Council (1991) 23 NSWLR 734 Ryde Municipal Council v Royal Ryde Homes (1970) 19 LGRA 321 Scott v Wollongong City Council (1992) 75 LGRA 112 Transport Action Group Against Motorways Inc v Roads and Traffic Authority (NSW) (1999) 46 NSWLR 598 Westfield Management limited v Perpetual Trustee Company limited [2006] NSWCA 245 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Clearstate Development Co Pty Ltd (Applicant) Liverpool City Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T To (Applicant) M Wright, SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate