NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lovric v State of New South Wales [2018] NSWDC 148 Hearing dates: 9, 10, 11 and 12 April 2018 Date of orders: 13 April 2018 Decision date: 13 April 2018 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: P Taylor SC DCJ Decision: (1) Judgment for the defendant. (2) Plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs. Catchwords: TORTS – intentional tort - assault and battery - unlawful imprisonment - malicious prosecution – offensive language – resist arrest – satisfaction that the arrest was reasonably necessary – reasonable and probable cause to commence proceedings – objective and subjective elements - malice - damages Legislation Cited: Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002, s 99, s 201, s 202, s 231 Cases Cited: A v NSW [2007] HCA 10 Clyne v State of New South Wales (No 1) [2011] NSWSC 629 Mulholland v Australian Electoral Commission (2004) 220 CLR 181 Newell; Muriniti v De Costi [2018] NSWCA 49 Ruddock v Taylor (2003) 58 NSWLR 269 Shalhoub v New South Wales [2017] NSWDC 363 State of New South Wales v Randall [2017] NSWCA 88 Thomas v Mowbray [2007] HCA 33 Zaravinos v State of New South Wales (2004) 62 NSWLR 58 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Denis Lovric (plaintiff) State of New South Wales (defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr J E Doyon (plaintiff) Mr M Hutchings (defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate