NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Mickovska v Cvetanovska [2015] NSWSC 2160 Hearing dates: 16 November 2015 Date of orders: 16 November 2015 Decision date: 16 November 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity - Family Provision List Before: Brereton J Decision: Orders for provision made. Catchwords: SUCCESSION – family provision – where deceased's estate consists only of real property – where plaintiff left with household contents and life estate in family home – whether and what provision should be made for plaintiff – obligation of testator towards surviving spouse – provision of security in home, income sufficient to live in reasonable degree of comfort and fund for modest luxuries and contingencies – applicability of principle where marriage was unhappy – financial and non-financial contributions of plaintiff to deceased's estate – plaintiff's future needs and health concerns – where no competing need amongst beneficiaries – appropriateness of Crisp Order as alternative to life estate – how liabilities of estate may be met without sale of house. Legislation Cited: (NSW) Succession Act 2006, Ch 3, s 60(2), s 66(1) Cases Cited: Chapple v Wilcox [2014] NSWCA 392; (2014) 87 NSWLR 646 Court v Hunt (NSW Supreme Court, Young J, 29 October 1987, unreported) Elliott v Elliott (NSW Supreme Court, Powell J, 18 May 1984, unreported) Elliott v Elliott (NSW Court of Appeal, Kirby P, Glass and McHugh JJA, 24 April 1986, unreported) Golosky v Golosky (NSW Court of Appeal, 5 October 1993, unreported) Lo Surdo v Public Trustee [2005] NSWSC 1186 Luciano v Rosenblum (1985) 2 NSWLR 65 O'Loughlin v O'Loughlin [2003] NSWCA 99 Paton v Public Trustee (NSW Supreme Court, 8 December 1988, unreported) Robertson v Pearce [2010] NSWSC 124 Singer v Berghouse (No 2) [1994] HCA 40; (1994) 181 CLR 201 Vigolo v Bostin [2005] HCA 11; (2005) 221 CLR 191 Walker v Walker (NSW Supreme Court, Young J, 17 May 1996, unreported) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ljubica Mickovska (plaintiff) Gorica (Jenny) Cvetanovska (now known as Subotic) (first defendant) Lila Gesovska (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: R Wilson SC (plaintiff) L Ellison SC (defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate