NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: LSKF Holdings Pty Ltd v Shield Lifestone Holdings Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 129 Hearing dates: 31 May 2018 Decision date: 20 June 2018 Before: Leeming JA at [1] Payne JA at [50] White JA at [51] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal. 2. Direct LSKF Holdings Pty Ltd to file a notice of appeal in accordance with the draft notice of appeal, and otherwise dispense with the rules as to service. 3. Appeal dismissed, with costs. Catchwords: CONTRACT – void or ineffective contract – illusory consideration – uncertainty – shareholders' agreement provided for funding requests to be made to 50% shareholder which was obliged to provide interest-free loans – loans could be recalled for any reason lender reasonably thought fit - whether promise to provide funding illusory because funding request required board unanimity and director who controlled lender could not be compelled to participate in funding request – whether director's discretion unfettered – whether discretion on part of director, and lender's entitlement to early repayment rendered promise uncertain – contract upheld and appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 232, 233, 236, 237, 1324 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 68 Cases Cited: Anglican Development Fund Diocese of Bathurst v Palmer [2015] NSWSC 1856 Bailes v Modern Amusements Pty Ltd [1964] VR 436 Crawley v Short [2009] NSWCA 410; 76 ACSR 286 G Scammell and Nephew Ltd v Ouston [1941] AC 251 Giasoumi v Ribbera [2017] VSC 631 Loan Investments Corporation of Australasia v Bonner [1970] NZLR 724 Meehan v Jones (1982) 149 CLR 571; [1982] HCA 52 O'Neill v Phillips [1999] UKHL 24; [1999] 2 All ER 961 Placer Development Ltd v Commonwealth (1969) 121 CLR 353; [1969] HCA 29 Re Neath Rugby Ltd (No 2) [2008] BCC 390 Re Neath Rugby Ltd [2009] 2 BCLC 427 Shield Lifestone Holdings Pty Ltd v LSKF Holdings Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 335 Wight v Haberdan Pty Ltd [1984] 2 NSWLR 280 Wilkie v Gordian Runoff Ltd (2005) 221 CLR 522; [2005] HCA 17 Texts Cited: N Seddon and R Bigwood, Cheshire & Fifoot Law of Contract (11th Aust ed, LexisNexis Butterworths, 2017) Category: Principal judgment Parties: LSKF Holdings Pty Ltd (Applicant) Shield Lifestone Holdings Pty Ltd (First Respondent) Litestone Holdings Pty Ltd (Second Respondent) Feng Ye (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: V Bedrossian (Applicant) J J Loofs SC, K J Young (First and Third Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate