NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Ltd v Dimitrov [2018] NSWDC 152 Hearing dates: 7 June 2018 Date of orders: 15 June 2018 Decision date: 15 June 2018 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Russell SC DCJ Decision: 1. Set aside the default judgment entered in favour of the plaintiff against the defendant on 23 May 2016. 2. Grant leave to the defendant to file and serve a Defence and Cross-Claim (if any) within 28 days. 3. Order the plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs of this Motion. Catchwords: JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS – setting aside default judgment – whether judgment made against good faith – default judgment obtained by plaintiff in circumstances where Financial Ombudsman Service had notified plaintiff that it would re-open defendant's Notice of Dispute – considerations relevant to setting aside judgment under Rule 36.15 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS – considerations relevant to setting aside default judgment under Rule 36.16 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 – defence on merits – adequate explanation for default and delay – whether defendant estopped from raising defences and cross-claims – release – effect of and principles of construction. Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: ABL Custodian Services Pty Limited v Kunz [2016] SADC 145 Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited v Gaedtke [2017] QDC 28 July 2017 Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited v Zipevski [2018] NSWDC 54 Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Ltd v Pekell Delaire Holdings Pty Ltd [2017] VSCA 51 Clarke v Great Southern Finance Pty Ltd [2014] VSC 516 Coles v Burke (1987) 10 NSWLR 429 Dillon v RBS Group (Australia) Pty Limited (No. 2) [2018] FCA 395 Dimitrov v The Supreme Court of Victoria [2017] HCA 51 Karam v ANZ Banking Group Limited & 1 Ors [2001] NSWSC 709 Luxton v Vines [1952] HCA 19; (1952) 85 CLR 352 Pekell Delaire Holdings Pty Limited v Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited [2016] VSC 570 Roach v B & W Steel Pty Limited (1991) 23 NSWLR 110 Timbercorp Finance Pty Limited (In Liquidation) v Collins [2016] HCA 44; (2016) 259 CLR 212 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited (plaintiff) Peter Dimitrov (defendant) Representation: Counsel: B Koch (plaintiff) S Ivantsoff (solicitor) (defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate