NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Nasih v Nguyen [2018] NSWDC 153 Hearing dates: 8 June 2018 Date of orders: 15 June 2018 Decision date: 15 June 2018 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Russell SC DCJ Decision: 1. Defendant's Notice of Motion filed on 25 May 2018 is dismissed. 2. Order the defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs. Catchwords: MOTOR ACCIDENTS – whether Statement of Claim filed out of time – suspension of time under s 109(2) Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 – certificate of exemption from assessment – whether application for exemption and issue of certificate operates to suspend time for commencing proceedings Legislation Cited: Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 Cases Cited: Paice v Hill [2009] NSWCA 156 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Sanaa Nasih (plaintiff) Yen Ngec Thi Nguyen (defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Cleary (plaintiff) D O'Dowd (defendant)
Solicitors: Stephen Smart & Associates (plaintiff) Hall & Wilcox (defendant) File Number(s): 2018/110096
Judgment
Introduction 1. This case raises a limitation point which has apparently not been decided in the 19 years since the commencement of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (the Act). 2. The plaintiff sued the defendant by a Statement of Claim filed on 9 April 2018, alleging that the defendant was the driver of a motor vehicle which collided with the plaintiff who was a pedestrian. Negligence is alleged. The accident occurred on 11 January 2015. By s 109(1)(a) of the Act a claimant is not entitled to commence proceedings in respect of a claim more than three years after the date of the motor accident to which the claim relates. The plaintiff commenced her proceedings on 9 April 2018 which is more than three years after the date of the motor accident. Section 109(2) of the Act provides: "Time does run for the purposes of this section from the time that a claim has been referred to the Authority for assessment and until two months after a certificate as to the assessment or exemption from assessment is issued." 1. By a Motion filed on 25 May 2018 the defendant seeks the dismissal of the Statement of Claim pursuant to s 109 of the Act. 2. The plaintiff has not sought leave of the court to commence the proceedings out of time, as she could have done under s 109(1). Rather, the plaintiff argues that she is within time because of the operation of s 109(2).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate