NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Nawal Azzi Khattar v Khattar Investments Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 905 Hearing dates: 24 May 2018 Decision date: 21 June 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Robb J Decision: See paragraph 46. Catchwords: INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTION — Application for interlocutory injunction — Whether interlocutory injunction should be granted — Interlocutory injunction granted — the balance of convenience favoured the granting an interlocutory injunction in favour of the plaintiff subject to certain qualifications Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Cases Cited: Thompson v White [2006] NSWCA 350 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57; [2006] HCA 46 Jackson v Richards [2005] NSWSC 630; (2005) 12 BPR 23,091 Doherty v Allman (1878) 3 App Cas 709 National Australia Bank Ltd v Bond Brewing Holdings Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 271; [1990] HCA 10 Jackson v Sterling Industries Ltd (1987) 162 CLR 612; [1987] HCA 23 His Eminence Metropolitan Petar, Diocesan Bishop of the Macedonian Orthodox Church of Australia and New Zealand v The Macedonian Orthodox Community Church St Petka Inc (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 142 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Nawal Azzi Khattar (Applicant/Plaintiff) Khattar Investments Pty Ltd (Respondent/Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Horowitz/L Rich (Applicant/Plaintiff) C.D. Wood (Respondent/Defendant)
Solicitors: Landerer & Company (Applicant/Plaintiff) Paramonte Legal (Respondent/Defendant) File Number(s): 2018/144379
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate