NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ping He v R [2018] NSWCCA 123 Hearing dates: 15 June 2018 Date of orders: 22 June 2018 Decision date: 22 June 2018 Before: Leeming JA; Bellew J; Fagan J Decision: Leave to appeal is granted The appeal is dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – subjective factors – parity – dealing with proceeds of crime knowing that they were proceeds contrary to Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 193B(2) – four further offences taken into account on a Form 1 – sentenced with co-offender on common principal charges – same aggregate sentence received as co-offender – where appellant's subjective case more favourable than co-offender – where co-offender had fewer offences on Form 1 – whether sentencing judge failed to give effect to findings on subjective case of appellant – whether disparity giving rise to "justifiable sense of grievance" – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 93T(1A), 193B(2) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 10, 33, 44, 53A(2) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(3) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), ss 10(1), 25(1) Cases Cited: DS v R [2014] NSWCCA 267 England v R [2009] NSWCCA 274 JM v R [2014] NSWCCA 297 Kerr v R [2016] NSWCCA 218 Tuivaga v R [2015] NSWCCA 145 Wong v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584; [2001] HCA 64 Zreika v R [2016] NSWCCA 177 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ping He (Appellant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: P Lange (Appellant) K Shead SC (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate