NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Jones v Williams (pseudonyms) [2018] NSWSC 954 Hearing dates: 15 June 2018 Decision date: 22 June 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: Plaintiff's application to extend the limitation period in respect of the cause of action pleaded at paragraphs 26 to 38 of the statement of claim refused; plaintiff's application for leave to file the proposed amended statement of claim served on 7 June 2018 refused; proceedings as against the 4th to 6th defendants dismissed; no order as to costs Catchwords: DEFAMATION – application to extend limitation period – plaintiff seeking to sue former parents-in-law and former wife for statements allegedly made to police in anticipation of application for Apprehended Domestic Violence Order – where plaintiff first learned of statements well after they were made – whether any discernible publication within the ultimate limitation period allowed under the Act – further delay in commencing proceedings – whether "not reasonable" to have commenced action within one year – consideration of factors relevant to discretion as to choice of date to which limitation period should be extended Legislation Cited: Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), s 121 Limitation Act 1969 (NSW), ss 14B, 56A Cases Cited: Barrett v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCA 304 Carey v ABC [2010] NSWSC 709 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Mr Jones (plaintiff) Mr A Williams (fourth defendant) Mrs B Williams (fifth defendant) Ms C Williams (sixth defendant) Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff self-represented C Amato, A Spies (fourth to sixth defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate