NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Chief Executive, Office of Environment and Heritage v Merriman [2018] NSWLEC 96 Hearing dates: 23 March 2018 Date of orders: 26 June 2018 Decision date: 22 June 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 5 Before: Pain J Decision: See [58] Catchwords: SENTENCING–plea of guilty-offence of clearing native vegetation – high end of low objective seriousness – substantial mitigating factors including registration of positive covenant on property title for revegetation of substantial area of land – exercise of sentencing discretion to make order under s 10(1)(b) of Crimes (Sentencing Procedure Act 1999) – defendant discharged subject to entering into a good behaviour bond Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 ss 10, 11, 21A, 22 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 126 Fines Act 1996 s 6 Local Land Services Amendment Act 2016 s 3 Native Vegetation Act 2003 ss 3, 12, 22, 23, 25, 44 Cases Cited: Axer Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (1993) 113 LGERA 357 Bentley v BGP Properties Pty Ltd (2006) 145 LGERA 234; [2006] NSWLEC 34 Camilleri's Stock Feeds Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (1993) 32 NSWLR 683 Chief Executive of Office of Environment and Heritage v Turnbull [2017] NSWLEC 141 Director-General, Department of Environment and Climate Change v Rae (2009) 168 LGERA 121; [2009] NSWLEC 137 Director-General, Department of Environment and Climate Change v Hudson (No 2) [2015] NSWLEC 110 Garrett v Freeman (No 5) (2009) 164 LGERA 287; [2009] NSWLEC 1 Garrett v Williams (2006) 160 LGERA 115; [2006] NSWLEC 785 Markarian v the Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Moseley v Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council (No 2) [2017] NSWLEC 52 Pittwater Council v Scahill (2009) 165 LGERA 289; [2009] NSWLEC 12 R v Paris [2001] NSWCCA 83 R v Peel [1971] 1 NSWLR 247 R v Wickham [2004] NSWCCA 193 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Chief Executive of the Office of Environment and Heritage (Prosecutor) Terrance Robert Merriman (Defendant) Representation: COUNSEL: Mr D Jordan (Prosecutor) Mr G Carolan (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate