NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Agnew (a pseudonym) v R [2018] NSWCCA 128 Hearing dates: 18 June 2018 Decision date: 27 June 2018 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Basten JA at [2]; Price J at [48] Decision: (1) Grant the applicant leave to appeal with respect to the third ground of appeal and the additional ground.
(2) Otherwise refuse leave to appeal with respect to grounds 1 and 2.
(3) Set aside the sentence imposed in the District Court and in place thereof sentence the applicant to 16 months imprisonment, comprising a non-parole period of 11 months dating from 1 January 2017 and an additional term of 5 months.
(4) Direct that the applicant be released on parole at the end of the non-parole period on the conditions fixed by the District Court.
(5) On the basis that he enters custody on 27 June 2018, he will be released on parole on 5 September 2018. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – sentencing – evidence of assistance to authorities rejected – sentence initially pronounced incorporated discount for assistance – sentence recast to remove discount – error in failing to admit evidence – whether appeal court required to resentence
CRIME – appeals – sentencing – evidence of further assistance to authorities – whether assistance post-sentencing available on appellate resentencing
CRIME – appeals – sentencing – plea entered on third day of period fixed for trial – plea to fresh indictment for lesser offence – lesser offence charged in Local Court – plea not proffered in Local Court – whether plea proffered at earliest opportunity – discount for late plea appropriate Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 321, 323 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 4 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 5, 6 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 22, 23 Cases Cited: De Campos v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 51 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 Einfeld v The Queen [2010] NSWCCA 87; 200 A Crim R 1 JM v The Queen [2008] NSWCCA 254 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Lehn v R (2016) 93 NSWLR 205; [2016] NSWCCA 255 R v Munday [1981] 2 NSWLR 177 Springer v The Queen [2007] NSWCCA 289; 177 A Crim R 13 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Agnew (a pseudonym) (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Lange (Applicant) Ms S Dowling SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate