NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Leonards Pharmacy Pty Ltd v Double Up 888 Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 974 Hearing dates: 19, 20, 24 April, 28 May 2018 Decision date: 03 July 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Emmett AJA Decision: Direct the plaintiff to file short minutes of orders to reflect the conclusions reached in the reasons of 3 July 2018. Catchwords: TRADE AND COMMERCE – contract for sale of a pharmacy – whether purchaser entitled to rescind – whether purchaser discharged obligation to do all things and make all applications and returns necessary to obtain approval under s 90 of the National Health Act 1953 (Cth) – whether purchaser used best endeavours to ensure that application was determined expeditiously – whether vendor entitled to forfeit deposit
TRADE AND COMMERCE – misleading and deceptive conduct – whether vendor made positive representations that he was not aware of an application for a second pharmacy in Coonamble – whether vendor remained silent as to his knowledge Legislation Cited: Australian Consumer Law (Sch 2, Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)) Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2 Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 55(2A) National Health Act 1953 (Cth), ss 90, 98 Cases Cited: Brown v Heffer (1967) 116 CLR 344 Butt v O'Dwyer (1952) 87 CLR 267 Dasreef Developments Pty Ltd v Josiv Velkovski [2017] NSWSC 1698 Foran v Wright (1989) 168 CLR 385 Hardy & Anor v Wardy [2001] NSWSC 1141 Hardy v Your Tabs Pty Ltd [2000] NSWCA 150 Jewelsnloo Pty Ltd v Sengos [2016] NSWCA 309 Mackay v Dick (1881) 6 App Cas 251 OXS Pty Ltd v Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority [2016] NSWCA 120 Suttor v Gundowda Pty Ltd (1950) 81 CLR 418 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Leonards Pharmacy Pty Ltd (Plaintiff and First Cross Defendant) Double Up 888 Pty Ltd (First Defendant and First Cross Claimant) Ngoc-Hien Duong (Second Defendant and Second Cross Claimant) Representation: Counsel: M J Heath (Plaintiff and First Cross Defendant) M Galvin (First and Second Defendants; First and Second Cross Claimants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate