NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Zaki Property Pty Ltd v ACE Australian Construction Experts Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 976 Hearing dates: 22 June 2018 Date of orders: 27 June 2018 Decision date: 27 June 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Robb J Decision: The Court: (1) Orders the respondent to pay the applicant's loss or expense incurred in complying with the subpoena issued by the respondent on 13 February 2018, fixed in the amount of $12,372.80. (2) Orders the respondent to pay the applicant's costs of the notice of motion. Catchwords: COSTS — Costs incurred by non-parties — Costs of compliance with a subpoena Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: ADM v FDGK (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 445 Danieletto v Khera (1995) 35 NSWLR 684 J Aron Corporation v Newmont Yandal Operations Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 996 Foyster v Foyster Holdings Pty Ltd (in liq) [2003] NSWSC 881 Deposit & Investment Co Ltd (Receivers Appointed) v Peat Marwick Mitchell & Co (1996) 39 NSWLR 267 Gooley v Breda Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 1505 Franklins Pty Ltd V Endeavour Holdings Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 1204 Category: Costs Parties: TSA Management Pty Ltd (applicant) ACE Australian Construction Experts Pty Ltd (respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Mee (applicant) YLR Chen (respondent)
Solicitors: Hardings Lawyers (applicant) RJI Legal (respondent) File Number(s): 2017/386567
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate