NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Sariban v Pocock; Pocock v Peipman (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 982 Hearing dates: 26 June 2018 Date of orders: 26 June 2018 Decision date: 26 June 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Hallen J Decision: See Paragraph 5, 8 and 15 Catchwords: PROCEDURE – FAMILY PROVISION – COSTS – Agreement as to costs as between Plaintiff and first Defendant – Agreement did not deal with costs of second Defendant – General rule – Costs follow the event
PROCEDURE – COSTS – Costs in related possession proceedings – Overall justice of the case does not warrant what would effectively be an indemnity costs order being made against Defendant Cases Cited: Sariban v Pocock; Pocock v Peipman [2018] NSWSC 724 Category: Costs Parties: 2016/382014 Ruth Vivian Sariban (Plaintiff) Ingrid Orlanda Amalie Pocock (first Defendant) Samuel Eskil Peipman (second Defendant)
2017/180094 Ingrid Orlanda Amalie Pocock (Plaintiff) Samuel Eskil Peipman (Defendant) Representation: Counsel:
2016/382014 Mentioned by Mr D Liebhold (Plaintiff) Mr D Liebhold (first Defendant) In person (second Defendant)
2017/188094 Mr D Liebhold (Plaintiff) In person (Defendant)
Solicitors:
2016/382014 Slater & Gordon Lawyers (Plaintiff) Hunt & Hunt Lawyers (Defendant) In person (second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate