NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Gold, David Marcus v R [2018] NSWCCA 135 Hearing dates: 16 May 2018 Decision date: 02 July 2018 Before: Basten JA at [1] Button J at [10] Fagan J at [88] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – offences of possessing child abuse material, disseminating child abuse material and grooming child for unlawful sexual activity – asserted error in the way the sentencing judge took into account the offences on the Form 1 – asserted failure of the sentencing judge adequately to take into account the applicant's mental condition at the time of the offences – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 66EB, 91H Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), ss 32, 33 Cases Cited: Attorney General's Application under s 37 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (No 2 of 2002) [2002] NSWCCA 515, (2002) 137 A Crim R 196 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194, (2010) 79 NSWLR 1 R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111, (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 Category: Principal judgment Parties: David Marcus Gold (Applicant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: P Boulten SC (Applicant) F Veltro (Crown)
Solicitors: Giddy and Crittenden (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2015/327378 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 12 April 2017 Before: Scotting DCJ File Number(s): 2015/327378
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate