NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kitoko v University of Technology Sydney [2018] NSWSC 1007 Hearing dates: 7 June 2018 Date of orders: 11 July 2018 Decision date: 11 July 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison AsJ Decision: The Court orders that:
(1) The plaintiff's summons dated 1 October 2017 seeking judicial review is dismissed.
(2) The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs on an ordinary basis. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review- whether UTS breached their Student Rules – whether denial of procedural fairness
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – summary dismissal- whether issue estoppel – whether factual basis of plaintiff's claims in these proceedings have already been determined adversely to the plaintiff in Federal Court proceedings- whether amendment to the summons can overcome the plaintiff's arguments that are subject to issue estoppel- whether plaintiff has an arguable case concerning breaches of the UTS Student Rules Legislation Cited: Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) University of Technology Sydney Act 1989 (NSW) University of Technology Sydney By-law 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Blair v Curran (1939) 62 CLR 464 Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keller Ltd (No 2) [1967] 1 AC 853 Kitoko v Mirvac Real Estate Pty Ltd [2015] NSWDC 152 Kitoko v University of Technology Sydney [2018] FCCA 699 Kitoko v Mirvac Real Estate Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 201 Kuligowski v Metrobus (2004) 220 CLR 363 O'Brien v Bank of Western Australia Ltd [2013] NSWCA 71 Ramsay v Pigram (1968) 118 CLR 271 Spencer v Commonwealth [2010] HCA 28; (2010) 241 CLR 118 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Vangu Kitoko (Plaintiff) University of Technology Sydney (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A Flecknoe-Brown (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate