NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Rodriguez & Sons Pty Ltd v Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority trading as Seqwater (No 15) [2018] NSWSC 1019 Hearing dates: 14 June 2018 Date of orders: 14 June 2018 Decision date: 04 July 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Beech-Jones J Decision: Parts of EXP.SEQ.003.0113 rejected and tender of SEQ.004.036.7950, SEQ.004.036.8522 and SEQ.004.036.7520 rejected Catchwords: EXPERT REPORT – assessment of reasonableness of flood engineer's belief about capacity of dam – reliance on events that post-date flood event – opinion with absence of reasoning – no question of principle Cases Cited: Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar (2011) 243 CLR 588; [2011] HCA 21 Rodriguez & Sons Pty Ltd v Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority trading as Seqwater (No 9) [2017] NSWSC 1116 Rodriguez & Sons Pty Ltd v Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority trading as Seqwater (No 10) [2018] NSWSC 149 Vairy v Wyong Shire Council [2005] HCA 62; 223 CLR 422 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Rodriguez & Sons Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority t/as Seqwater (First Defendant) SunWater Limited (Second Defendant) State of Queensland (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Sexton SC; N Owens SC; R Yezerski; J Taylor (Plaintiff) B O'Donnell QC; A Pomerenke QC; D Piggott; D Klineberg (First Defendant) D Williams SC; HJA Neal; N Simpson (Second Defendant) GA Thompson QC; JM Horton QC; E Morzone (Third Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate