NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Feldman v Polaris Media Pty Ltd as trustee of The Polaris Media Trust trading as The Australian Jewish News (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 1035 Hearing dates: 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 July 2017 Decision date: 23 July 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: Judgment for the defendants Catchwords: DEFAMATION – defences – defence of honest opinion – publication of articles concerning evidence given by a rabbi to the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse – articles attributing rabbi with reprehensible ignorance of the fact that to touch a child for sexual gratification on the genitals was a crime – whether conveyed as opinion or fact – whether any opinion was based on proper material – defence of justification – consideration of effect of rabbi's evidence to the Royal Commission – defence of contextual truth – where defence required to be determined only in case of appeal – whether necessary to determine the truth of serious contextual imputations – appropriateness of determining defence on alternative assumptions – defence of fair report – consideration of principle that report does not have to be a complete account of the proceedings of public concern – whether report must nonetheless be a complete account of the evidence on the topic reported – defence of statutory qualified privilege – publication of articles concerning hearings before the Royal Commission – consideration of requirement that the conduct of the defendants in publishing the information was reasonable in the circumstances
JUDGMENTS – where defendants pleaded multiple defences – success on two defences obviating the need to determine remaining defences – consideration of requirement that the judge should ordinarily determine all factual questions in the proceedings Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 3A Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61M, 61N Defamation Act 2005 (NSW), ss 25, 26, 29, 30, 31 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 15.28(2)(a) Cases Cited: Abou-Lokmeh v Harbour Radio Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 228 Austin v Mirror Newspapers Ltd (1985) 3 NSWLR 354 Barbaro v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd (1985) 1 NSWLR 30 Bickel v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd (1981) 2 NSWLR 474 Carolan v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 6) [2016] NSWSC 1091 Chakravarti v Advertiser Newspapers Ltd (1998) 193 CLR 519; [1998] HCA 37 Channel Seven Adelaide Pty Ltd v Manock (2007) 232 CLR 245; [2007] HCA 60 Cheikho v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No 5) [2016] NSWSC 29 Cush v Dillon (2011) 243 CLR 298; [2011] HCA 30 Eades v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (2010) 77 NSWLR 173; [2010] NSWCA 241 Fairfax Digital Australia & New Zealand Pty Ltd v Kazal [2018] NSWCA 77 Greek Herald Pty Ltd v Nikolopoulos (2001) 54 NSWLR 165; [2002] NSWCA 41 Gulic v Boral Transport Ltd [2016] NSWCA 269 Hanrahan v Ainsworth (1990) 22 NSWLR 73 O'Brien v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2016] NSWSC 1289 O'Brien v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2017] NSWCA 338 Roberts v Bass (2002) 212 CLR 1; [2002] HCA 57 Sleiman Investments Pty Ltd as trustee for the Sleiman Family Trust v Deputy Commissioner [2017] NSWCA 81 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Yosef Yitzchak Feldman (Plaintiff) Polaris Media Pty Ltd as trustee of The Polaris Media Trust trading as The Australian Jewish News (First Defendant) Joshua Levi (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Cohen (Plaintiff) S T Chrysanthou with N G Olson (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate