NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Smith v R [2018] NSWCCA 137 Hearing dates: 1 June 2018 Decision date: 11 July 2018 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Leeming JA at [5]; Adamson J at [62]. Decision: 1. Leave granted.
2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against conviction - robbery in company with wounding - numerous inconsistencies in complainant's evidence - whether open to jury to accept complainant's evidence and be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt of accused's guilt
EVIDENCE - relevance - photographic evidence of complainant's injuries tendered - accused accepted he has assaulted complainant in circumstances going beyond self-defence - whether error by primary judge in admitting photographs into evidence Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 98 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 5, 6 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 55, 56, 137 Cases Cited: Dickson v R (2017) 94 NSWLR 476; [2017] NSWCCA 78 Phillips v R [2016] NSWCCA 159 R v Baden-Clay (2016) 258 CLR 308; [2016] HCA 53 SKA v The Queen (2011) 243 CLR 400; [2011] HCA 400 Smith v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 650; [2001] HCA 50 Vickers v R [2006] NSWCCA 60; 160 A Crim R 195 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Stewart Eric Smith (Appellant) Regina (Respondent Crown) Representation: Counsel: A Evers and P Allport (Appellant) E Balodis (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate