NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v Levick (No 2) [2018] NSWCATOD 108 Hearing dates: 27 March 2018 Date of orders: 06 April 2018 Decision date: 06 April 2018 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: L P Robberds QC, Senior Member P Durack SC, Senior Member B Thomson, General Member Decision: In this application the Tribunal made its finding and orders on 6 April 2018 – see Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v Levick [2018] NSWCATOD 48 Catchwords: Disciplinary proceedings against barrister – consent orders under s 144 Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 proposed by parties – should Tribunal exercise its discretion and make those orders – professional misconduct – answers to questions from New South Wales Bar Association were misleading and dishonest Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW) Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW) Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (NSW) Cases Cited: Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v Breeze [2015] NSWCATOD 152 Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v Levick [2018] NSWCATOD 48 Law Society of New South Wales v Foreman (1994) 34 NSWLR 408 New South Wales Bar Association v Butland [2009] NSWADT 177 Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales v Costello [1984) 3 NSWLR 201 Texts Cited: Lawyers' Professional Responsibility – Dal Pont, 5th edition Solicitors Manual – The College of Law – vol 1 [33060,F/N 3 and 4] Category: Principal judgment Parties: Council of the New South Wales Bar Association (Applicant) Julieanne Levick (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Douglas-Baker (Applicant) P Boulten SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate