NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Neale v Mahony [2018] NSWSC 1046 Hearing dates: 27 June 2018 Date of orders: 13 July 2018 Decision date: 13 July 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: (1) Apart from the claim identified in paragraph 8(d) of the Statement of Claim, the claims pleaded in the Statement of Claim are dismissed pursuant to UCPR r 13.4;
(2) The whole of the pleading contained in the Statement of Claim is struck out pursuant to UCPR r 14.28;
(3) Grant leave to the plaintiff to re-plead the claim identified in paragraph 8(d) of the Statement of Claim;
(4) Any re-pleaded Amended Statement of Claim is to be served in draft on the solicitors for the defendant by 3 August 2018;
(5) Stand over the further hearing of the Notice of Motion to Friday 10 August, 2018 at 2.00pm;
(6) Costs reserved. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – summary disposal – dismissal of proceedings – plaintiff alleged that solicitor negligently conducted the defence of previous proceedings arising from his default under a mortgage – extended estoppel – abuse of process – where findings made against plaintiff in previous proceedings - whether solicitor immune from suit – no reasonable cause of action disclosed in respect of claims involving earlier findings – UCPR r 13.4
CIVIL PROCEDURE – pleadings – form and content of pleading – defective particulars of negligence – all pleadings struck out – plaintiff granted leave to re-plead solicitor's failure to lodge a caveat on the land – UCPR r 14.28
ESTOPPEL – extended estoppel – finality – abuse of process - whether solicitor failed to plead the undervalue sale by receivers of land owned by plaintiff – whether failure to plead caused plaintiff's loss – issue fundamental to previous proceedings issue determined adversely to plaintiff in earlier proceedings Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 13.4, 14.28 Cases Cited: Attwells v Jackson Lalic Lawyers Pty Ltd (2016) 259 CLR 1; [2016] HCA 16 D'Orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid (2005) 223 CLR 1; [2005] HCA 12 Haines v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1995) 43 NSWLR 404 James Woodward Neale v Bank of Western Australia Ltd; Bank of Western Australia Ltd v James Woodward Neale [2014] NSWSC 315 Keefe v Marks (1989) 16 NSWLR 713 Neale v Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd trading as Bank of Western Australia [2015] NSWCA 272 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589 Reichel v Magrath (1889) 14 App Cas 665 Rippon v Chilcotin Pty Ltd (2001) 53 NSWLR 198; [2001] NSWCA 142 State Bank of NSW Ltd v Stenhouse Ltd (1997) Aust Torts Rep 81-423 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: James Woodward Neale (Plaintiff) John Francis Mahony (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: In person (Plaintiff) A Maroya (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate