Council of the City of Ryde v Sally Haddad (as executrix of the estate of the late Dr Jim Haddad) (No 2) [2018] NSWCA 147

Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Council of the City of Ryde v Sally Haddad (as executrix of the estate of the late Dr Jim Haddad) (No 2) [2018] NSWCA 147 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 12 July 2018 Before: McColl JA, Gleeson JA, Sackville AJA Decision: The respondent pay the Council's costs of the appeal (including the costs of the application for leave to appeal). Legislation Cited: Standard Instrument (Local Environmental Plans) Order 2006 Cases Cited: Council of the City of Ryde v Haddad executor of the estate of Dr Haddad [2018] NSWCA 35 Category: Costs Parties: Council of the City of Ryde (Appellant) Sally Haddad (as executrix of the estate of the Late Dr Jim Haddad) (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr A Pickles SC / Ms A Pearman (Appellant) Mr T Southwell-Keely (Respondent)

Solicitors: Planning Law Solutions (Appellant) Owen Hodge Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/217081 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Land and Environment Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Class 1 Citation: [2017] NSWLEC 70 Date of Decision: 20 June 2017 Before: Sheahan J File Number(s): 2016/29933

[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]