NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: TP v R [2018] NSWCCA 140 Hearing dates: 8 June 2018 Date of orders: 16 July 2018 Decision date: 16 July 2018 Before: White JA at [1] Bellew J at [2] Wilson J at [30] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal against sentence dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Sentence – Appeal – Sexual offending – Where applicant was the father of the victim – Where the offending occurred in home environment where victim entitled to feel safe – Multiplicity of offences – Offending accompanied by reassurances on the part of the applicant to the victim that the acts constituting the offending were appropriate – Limited significance of short duration of offending – Necessity for general deterrence – Necessity to balance an offender's subjective case against the objective seriousness of the offending – Sentence not manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1; 168 A Crim R 41 Croxon v R [2017] NSWCCA 213 Dinsdale v R (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 Doe v R [2013] NSWCCA 248 Kearsley v R [2017] NSWCCA 28 R v Dodd (1991) 57 A Crim R 349 R v Freedman [2017] NSWCCA 201 R v Van Ryn [2016] NSWCCA 1 Simpson v R [2014] NSWCCA 23 Vaiusu v R [2017] NSWCCA 71 Category: Principal judgment Parties: TP – Applicant Regina – Respondent Representation: Counsel: G D Woods QC and T Woods – Applicant F Veltro – Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate