NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: TTM Investment Corporation Pty Ltd v Hua Chang Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 1078 Hearing dates: 26 June; 9 July 2018 Date of orders: 13 July 2018 Decision date: 13 July 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity - Applications List Before: Parker J Decision: Security for costs order and freezing order to be granted. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – security for costs – discretionary considerations – where party resisting order not acting purely defensively in main proceedings – relevance of the strength of a party's claim
CIVIL PROCEDURE – security for costs order – quantum of security – ascertaining quantum where neither party is acting purely defensively in main proceedings – difficulty in ascertaining quantum where claims and cross-claims are interconnected
CIVIL PROCEDURE – interlocutory application – freezing order – risk of removing assets out of jurisdiction – where party has little to no connection with jurisdiction – where party has commercial incentive to remove assets from jurisdiction Legislation Cited: Home Building Act 1989 (NSW), s 92(1) Cases Cited: Patterson v BTR Engineering (Aust) Limited (1989) 18 NSWLR 319 Ninemia Maritime Corp v Trave Schiffahrtsgesellschaft & Co KG (The Niedersachen) [1983] 1 WLR 1412 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Hua Chang Pty Ltd (First Defendant/Applicant) TTM Investment Corporation Pty Ltd (Plaintiff/Respondent) Representation: Counsel: JC Lee (First Defendant/Applicant) AL Connolly (Plaintiff/Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate