NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Suksa-Ngacharoen v Regina [2018] NSWCCA 142 Hearing dates: 4 June 2018 Date of orders: 10 August 2018 Decision date: 10 August 2018 Before: Leeming JA and Bellew J at [1] Wilson J at [24] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal. 2. Appeal allowed. 3. Quash the sentence imposed on 28 October 2016, and in lieu thereof, sentence the offender as follows: (a) Call-up for Common Assault (breach s 9 bond): 3 months imprisonment to date from 10 March 2014, expiring on 9 June 2014. (b) Call-up for Contravene ADVO (breach s 12 bond): 7 months imprisonment to date from 10 March 2014, expiring on 9 October 2014. (c) Contravene ADVO: 18 months imprisonment to date from 10 July 2014, expiring on 9 January 2016. (d) Cause grievous bodily harm by explosion: 16 years imprisonment to date from 10 March 2015, expiring on 9 March 2031; with a non-parole period of 11 years, expiring on 9 March 2026. 4. The total effective sentence is 17 years imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 12 years. The earliest date the offender is eligible for release on parole is 9 March 2026. Catchwords: CRIME – sentence appeal – domestic violence offences – cause grievous bodily harm by explosion – breach apprehended domestic violence order – call-ups for breaches of bonds – question of procedural fairness – use of "agreed facts" and whether sentencing court bound by them - question of extent of premeditation – assessment of objective gravity – assessment of remorse and rehabilitation – manifest excess Legislation Cited: Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Cases Cited: Alvares v R; Farache v R [2011] NSWCCA 33 Betts v The Queen (2016) 258 CLR 420; [2016] HCA 25 Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1; (2007) 168 A Crim R 41 Chow v Director of Public Prosecutions & Anor (1992) 28 NSWLR 593 Dinsdale v R [2000] HCA 54; (2000) 202 CLR 321 Director of Public Prosecutions v Dalgliesh (a pseudonym) [2017] HCA 41 Elias v The Queen (2013) 248 CLR 483; [2013] HCA 31 GAS v The Queen; SJK v The Queen [2004] HCA 22; (2004) 217 CLR 198 Jolly v R [2013] NSWCCA 76 Kendall v R [2015] NSWCCA 13 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 MLP v R [2014] NSWCCA 183 O'Neill-Shaw v The Queen [2010] NSWCCA 42 Pleasance v R [2016] NSWCCA 113 Porter v R [2008] NSWCCA 145 R v Dinh [2010] NSWCCA 74 R v Dodd (1991) 57 A Crim R 349 R v MAK; R v MSK [2006] NSWCCA 381; (2006) 167 A Crim R 159 R v Palu [2002] NSWCCA 381; 134A Crim R 174 R v Shorten (unreported decision of the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal, 10 September 1997) TYN v R [2009] NSWCCA 146 Vaiusu v R [2017] NSWCCA 71 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465 Vuni v R [2006] NSWCCA 171 Wong v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584; [2001] HCA 64 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Surachet Suksa-Ngacharoen – Applicant Regina – Respondent Representation: Counsel: Mr S. Torpey – Applicant Ms M. England – Respondent (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate