NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Robert Leslie Watson (No 2) [2018] NSWDC 186 Hearing dates: 16-17 April 2018 Decision date: 18 April 2018 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Mahony SC DCJ Decision: For Orders see [62] Catchwords: Tendency Evidence; Separate trial of one count on the Indictment Legislation Cited: Criminal Code (Cth) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: BC v R [2015] NSWCCA 327 BJS v R [2011] NSWCCA 239 De Jesus v R (1986) 61 ALJR 1 DPP v FM [2013] VSCA 129 Dupas v R (2012) 40VR 182 DSJ v R [2012] NSWCCA 9 FB v R [2011] NSWCCA 217 Hughes v R [2017] HCA 20 IMM v R [2016] HCA 14 R v Ford [2009] NSWCCA 306 R v Johnston [2012] ACTSC 89 R v Lockyer [1986] 89 ACrimR 457 R v Shamouil (2006) 66 NSWLR 228 R v XY [2013] NSWCCA 12 Sutton v R [1984] HCA 5 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Robert Leslie Watson (Offender) Representation: Counsel: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Robert Leslie Watson (Accused)
Solicitors: B Anniwell (Crown) M Swift (Offender) File Number(s): 14/194620 Publication restriction: Pursuant to s 7 of the Court Supression and Non-Publication Act 2010 (NSW) there is to be no disclosure of information that will reveal or likely reveal the identity of the assumed online identity "CEIU14", in accordance with order made on 5 July 2018. The assumed online identity in this judgment will be referred to as AOI.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate