NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Murdock v Betham [2018] NSWDC 192 Hearing dates: 13 June 2018 Date of orders: 20 June 2018 Decision date: 20 June 2018 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: P Taylor SC DCJ Decision: (1) Judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $243,254. (2) Defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs. Catchwords: ASSESSMENT – assault – false imprisonment – domestic violence - wife confined by husband – cuts to breasts and wrists – fear of death – cold and naked – scars – post-traumatic stress disorder - damages Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Elliott v Kotsopoulos [2009] NSWDC 164 Lamb v Cotogno (1987) 164 CLR 1; [1987] HCA 47 M v Nesbitt [2012] NSWDC 152 New South Wales v Radford (2010) 79 NSWLR 327; [2010] NSWCA 276 Shalhoub v State of New South Wales [2017] NSWDC 363 State of NSW v Abed [2014] NSWCA 419 Uren v John Fairfax (1966) 117 CLR 118; [1966] HCA 40 Yen v Yen [2010] FamCA 1 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Melinda Suan Tinn Murdock (plaintiff) William Fagege Betham (defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Weightman (plaintiff)
Solicitors: Carroll & O'Dea (plaintiff) File Number(s): 2018/14708 Publication restriction: None
Judgment
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate