NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Parker (No. 2) [2018] NSWSC 1122 Hearing dates: 9 and 10 July 2018 Date of orders: 10 July 2018 Decision date: 10 July 2018 Before: Adamson J Decision: See rulings in paragraph [64] Catchwords: EVIDENCE – maker unavailable because deceased – whether circumstance that statement made to police in which maker acknowledged that he would be liable to prosecution if any part untrue fulfils requirement in s 65(2)(c) – insufficient – possibility that maker not disinterested in police investigation – Crown's onus not discharged
EVIDENCE – tendency evidence that deceased did not, on prior occasions, inject himself but rather arranged for others to inject him with intravenous drugs – significant probative value in case where manslaughter by unlawful and dangerous act alleged – evidence allowed
EVIDENCE – business record – clinical note made of consultation with deceased – whether ought be admitted – whether maker unavailable – Crown's obligation of fairness to the accused – ruling deferred pending return of subpoena
CRIME – manslaughter – criminal negligence – authorities considered – whether evidence to support proposition that accused had secluded the deceased when he was in a compromised state – rejection of deceased witness' statement led to Crown's abandonment of this basis of manslaughter Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 48, 65, 69, 97, 101, 135, 137, 142, 166, 167, 168, 169, Dictionary, cl 4 Cases Cited: Albrighton v Royal Prince Alfred Hospital [1980] 2 NSWLR 542 Burns v The Queen (2012) 246 CLR 334; [2012] HCA 35 Elomar v R [2014] NSWCCA 303; (2014) 316 ALR 206 Hughes v The Queen [2017] HCA 20; (2017) 92 ALJR 52 Munro v The Queen [2014] ACTCA 11 Onassis v Vergottis [1968] 2 Lloyds Rep 403 R v Afu; R v Caleo (No 15) [2018] NSWSC 245 R v Ambrosoli (2002) 55 NSWLR 603; [2002] NSWCCA 386 R v Evans [2009] 1 WLR 1999 R v Miller [1983] 2 AC 161 R v Taktak (1988) 14 NSWLR 226 Sio v The Queen (2016) 259 CLR 47; [2016] HCA 32 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Mark Patrick Parker (Accused) Representation: Counsel: C M Everson (Crown) E Ozen (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate