NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Regent Land Pty Ltd ATF Regent Land Unit Trust v Georges River Council [2018] NSWLEC 1370 Hearing dates: 5, 6 July 2018 Date of orders: 24 July 2018 Decision date: 24 July 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Smithson C Decision: (1) Leave is granted for the applicant to rely on amended plans. (2) The applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs pursuant to section 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, as agreed or assessed. (3) The clause 4.6 variation request for breaches to the height standard to enable four rooftop apartments is not upheld. (4) The clause 4.6 variation request for breaches to the height standard to enable rooftop communal open space, and lift access to it, is upheld. (5) The appeal is upheld. (6) Development Application DA111/2017 for the demolition of existing buildings, amalgamation of lots and construction of a residential flat building at 70-78 Regent Street, Kogarah is approved subject to the conditions in Annexure A. (7) The exhibits are returned except for Exhibits A, B, C, 2 and 3. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – compliance with new high density controls for the Kogarah North Precinct; strategic intent of controls; planned density; height breach; clause 4.6; site amalgamation requirement; site isolation; development if not amalgamated; precedent; objections Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Kogarah Local Environmental Plan 2012 State Environmental Planning Policy No.65 (Design Quality of Residential Flat Development) (SEPP 65) Cases Cited: Four2FivePty Ltd v Ashfield Council [2015] NSWLEC 1009 Wehbe v Pittwater Council [2007] NSWLEC 827 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regent Land Pty Ltd ATF Regent Land Unit Trust (Applicant) Georges River Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T To (Applicant) Dr S Berveling (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate