NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Donnellan v Armidale Regional Council [2018] NSWLEC 1372 Hearing dates: 27 June, 9 July 2018 Date of orders: 20 July 2018 Decision date: 20 July 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Gray C Decision: The Court orders that: (1) The appeal is upheld, (2) Development consent is granted for the subdivision of Lot 2 DP 1238849 into two Torrens title lots, in accordance with the plan of subdivision dated 9 April 2018 and subject to the conditions in Annexure A. (3) The exhibits are returned, except for exhibits A, B, 1 and 5. Catchwords: APPEAL – development application – two-lot subdivision of land – weight to be given to DCP – lot layout and design – whether kerb and guttering required – whether consent would create an undesirable precedent Legislation Cited: Armidale Dumaresq Development Control Plan 2012 Armidale Dumaresq Local Environmental Plan 2012 Community Land Development Act 1989 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 4.15(3A) Land and Environment Court Act 1979 State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008 State Environmental Planning Policy No 1—Development Standards Cases Cited: Botany Bay City Council v Saab Corp Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 308 Cardwell Shire Council v King Ranch Australia Pty Ltd [1984] HCA 39; 58 ALJR 386 Cavasinni Constructions Pty Ltd v Fairfield City Council [2010] NSWLEC 65 Community Association DP 270982 v Registrar-General for New South Wales [2018] NSWSC 225 Dogild Pty Ltd v Warringah Council 158 LGERA 429; [2008] NSWLEC 53 Newbury District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment [1981] AC 578 Planning Commission (WA) v Temwood Holdings Pty Ltd (2004) 221 CLR 30 Stockland Development Pty Ltd v Manly Council [2004] NSWLEC 472 Zhang v Canterbury City Council (2001) 115 LGERA 373; [2001] NSWCA 167 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Suzanne Donnellan (Applicant) Armidale Regional Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Donnellan (Self-represented) M Hawley, Solicitor (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate