NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: SLD Development One Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council [2018] NSWLEC 1374 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 14 June, 5 July 2018 Date of orders: 20 July 2018 Decision date: 20 July 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Walsh C Decision: See [4] below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: SLD Development One Pty Ltd (Applicant) Sutherland Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: G Green, Pikes & Verekers Lawyers (Applicant) J Amy, Sutherland Shire Council (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/368902 Publication restriction: No
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act. As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to "dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision". 2. The Court Act also required me to "set out in writing the terms of the decision" (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. 3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties. 4. The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are: 1. The applicant is granted leave to rely upon the amended plans referred to in condition 1 in the approved conditions at annexure "A". 2. The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs thrown away pursuant to s8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the sum of $4,500 within 28 days. 3. The appeal is upheld. 4. Development Application DA17/0198 for demolition of existing buildings and construction of a six storey residential flat building comprising 23 units and basement parking at 51-53 Glencoe Street, Sutherland is approved subject to the conditions of consent at annexure "A". ………………………. P Walsh Commissioner of the Court Annexure A (166 KB, pdf) Plans CL_Part1 (5.94 MB, pdf) Plans CL_Part2 (5.33 MB, pdf) Plans CL_Part3 (7.60 MB, pdf) Plans CL_Part4 (5.80 MB, pdf) Plans CL_Part5 (7.68 MB, pdf) Plans CL_Part6 (1.99 MB, pdf) DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 20 July 2018
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate