NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Bickley v R [2018] NSWCCA 153 Hearing dates: 20 July 2018 Decision date: 17 August 2018 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Fullerton J at [2] R A Hulme J at [3] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal against sentence granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – sentence appeal – aggravated break and enter and commit serious indictable offence – sentenced to 3 years imprisonment with 1 year 9 months non-parole period –extensive criminal history and substance abuse problem – on bail at time of offence – sentence reduced for early guilty plea – whether judge erred by failing to adjourn pursuant to Crimes Sentencing Procedure Act 1999 (NSW) s 11 – clearly open to judge to decline to adjourn pursuant to s 11 – whether sentence manifestly excessive – sentencing statistics consistent with appellant's sentence – cannot be said that sentence manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 61, 112(2) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s 11 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ryan Daniel Bickley (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Applicant self-represented Ms M England (Crown)
Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions File Number(s): 2017/47125 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Date of Decision: 15 September 2017 Before: Wells DCJ File Number(s): 2017/47125
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate