NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Gulic v Angelovski [2018] NSWCA 161 Hearing dates: 9 July 2018 Decision date: 27 July 2018 Before: Beazley P at [1]; McColl JA at [2]; Sackville AJA at [3] Decision: 1. Appeal dismissed. 2. Appellant to pay the respondent's costs. Catchwords: TORTS – breach of duty by solicitor – assessment of damages – what personal injury damages would have been awarded to the plaintiff as at notional trial date – whether primary judge erred in awarding modest damages for loss of earning capacity Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) 5D, 5E Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 140 Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW) ss 126, 128 Cases Cited: Commonwealth v Elliott [2004] NSWCA 360 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22 Johnson v Perez (1988) 166 CLR 351; [1988] HCA 64 Purkess v Crittenden (1965) 114 CLR 164; [1965] HCA 34 Robinson Helicopter Company Inc v McDermott [2016] HCA 22; (2016) 331 ALR 550 Seltsam Pty Ltd v Ghaleb [2005] NSWCA 208 Vosebe Pty Ltd v Bakavgas; Vosebe Pty Ltd v Vapore [2009] NSWCA 117 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Milenko Gulic (Appellant) Lupco Angelovski t/as BJ Murphy Angelovski & Associates (First Respondent) Rocco Ardino t/as Morgan Ardino & Co Solicitors (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr PW Bates (Appellant) Mr P Braham SC / Ms R Mansted (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate