NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Estate Reid; Roberts v Moses and Palmer [2018] NSWSC 1145 Hearing dates: 28-30 November, 1 December 2017; and 2 May 2018 Decision date: 26 July 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity - Probate List Before: Lindsay J Decision: Declarations and orders to be made consequentially upon construction of the will and codicils of the deceased. Catchwords: SUCCESSION – Wills, probate and administration – Construction and effect of testamentary dispositions – Gift of income from dividends on shares owned only indirectly by testator through company owned and controlled by him – Gift of shares in that company to another person, subject to the gift of income – By accepting gift of shares, second person personally bound in equity to satisfy gift of income Legislation Cited: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Cth Succession Act 2006 NSW Cases Cited: Attorney General v Wax Chandlers Co. (1873) LR 6 HL 1 Countess of Bective v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1932) 47 CLR 417 Fell v Fell (1922) 31 CLR 268 Gill v Gill (1921) 21 SR (NSW) 400 Gregg v Coates (1856) 23 Beav 33; 53 ER 13 In re Hodge; Hodge v Griffiths [1940] Ch 260 Jones v Krawczyk [2011] NSWSC 139 Messenger v Andrews (1828) 2 Russ 478; 38 ER 885 Muschinski v Dodds (1985) 160 CLR 583 Perpetual Trustee Co Limited v Wright (1987) 9 NSWLR 18 Ramsay Trustees Executors and Agency Co. Ltd (1948) 77 CLR 321 Rees v Engelback (1871) LR 12 Eq 225 Sciacca v Ghidella, Reghenzani [2001] QSC 134 Warton v Yeo [2014] NSWSC 494 Williams v Legg (Court of Appeal, unreported, 16 March 1993) Texts Cited: - Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff: Peta Roberts First Defendant: Rupert James Moses Second Defendant: Philip Stanley Palmer Third Defendant: Andrew Moses Fourth Defendant: Sarah Moses Fifth Defendant: Vanreid Industries Pty Ltd ACN 008 465 325 Sixth Defendant: Vanreid Enterprises Pty Ltd ACN 000 920 945 Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: MK Meek SC and N Bilinsky First & Second Defendants: C Harris SC and C Birtles Third & Fourth Defendants: C Hodgson Fifth & Sixth Defendants: S Hughes
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate