NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Targus Group (UK) v Targus Group [2018] NSWSC 1171 Hearing dates: 27/07/2018 Date of orders: 27 July 2018 Decision date: 27 July 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: McDougall J Decision: Order that the general meeting of the first defendant be postponed until 2pm on Thursday 2 August. Otherwise refuse application for interlocutory relief. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – interlocutory application by third defendant to restrain plaintiff from proposing a resolution for appointment of additional directions and voting on those resolutions – whether plaintiff and third defendant agreed that each party was entitled to appoint two directors – whether plaintiff estopped from denying this is the case – unnecessary to determine on interlocutory application although serious question to be tried with regard to the former – where minimal detriment to third defendant if meeting proceeds – where some evidence of irregularities that appointment of independent directors could remedy – balance of convenience points strongly towards refusal of interlocutory relief – application refused. Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Targus Group (UK) Ltd UK Company Number 02989548 (Plaintiff) Targus Group Pty Ltd ACN 003 527 008 (First Defendant) Heathmere Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Alenka Tindale (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: I M Jackman SC / M R Tyson (Plaintiff) F Roughley (First Defendant) K Morgan SC / B Ng (Third Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate