NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Tradelink Constructions Pty Ltd v Cumberland Council [2018] NSWLEC 1397 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 13 July 2018 Date of orders: 02 August 2018 Decision date: 02 August 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dickson C Decision: See [4] below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Tradelink Constructions Pty Ltd (Applicant) Cumberland Council (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: P Rigg, Peter R Rigg (Applicant) P Hudson, Marsdens Law Group (Respondent) File Number(s): 2018/55164 Publication restriction: Nil
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to "dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision". 2. The Court Act also required me to "set out in writing the terms of the decision" (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. 3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties. 4. The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are: 1. Leave is granted to the Applicant to amend development application DA No. 2017/510/1 by substituting the following plans for the plans that are the subject of DA 2017/510/1: * Architectural Plans prepared by Idraft Architects, Job Number 27780, Cover Sheet (undated), Drawing No's. 03 and 6 to 16 (inclusive), Revision B, dated 2 May 2018. 1. The appeal is upheld. 2. Development Application DA 2017/510/1 for amendments to the development approves pursuant to Development Consent No 2013/475, including changes to the floor to ceiling height of the first floor level, changes to the ground floor plan including Unit 4 to be configured as suitable as an adaptable unit and an increase in the capacity of the garbage storage area, changes to the appearance of the external façade, the addition of a fourth storey to accommodate 5 additional units, and the provision of six "affordable" units under the provisions of State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009 (to comprise a total of 22 units and 42 car parking spaces), is approved subject to the conditions of consent at Annexure 'A'. ………………………. D M Dickson Commissioner of the Court Annexure A (C) DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 03 August 2018
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate