NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Elshaimy v R [2018] NSWCCA 169 Hearing dates: 9 July 2018 Decision date: 03 August 2018 Before: Meagher JA at [1] R A Hulme J at [2] Button J at [3] Decision: (1) Extension of time and leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – asserted failure of sentencing judge to make findings about applicant's risk of re-offending and prospects of rehabilitation – asserted justifiable sense of grievance on the part of applicant due to sentence disparity with co-offenders – no erroneous disparity found – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 97(1), 112(2) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 21A(3) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Adam Mohamad Elshaimy (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G James AM QC (Applicant) B Hatfield (Respondent)
Solicitors: Hallani & Associates (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2013/317160 Publication restriction: Nil. Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 27 May 2016 Before: GD Woods QC DCJ File Number(s): 2013/317160
Judgment 1. MEAGHER JA: I agree with Button J. 2. R A HULME J: I agree with Button J. 3. BUTTON J:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate