NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Fitzgerald v R [2018] NSWCCA 170 Hearing dates: 25 July 2018 Date of orders: 06 August 2018 Decision date: 06 August 2018 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Price J at [2] Davies J at [3] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted.
(2) Appeal dismissed.
(3) Time not to count except for 49 days.
(4) The sentence will now expire on 16 May 2020 and the non-parole period will expire on 16 June 2019. Catchwords: SENTENCING – appeal against sentence – aggravated break and enter and commit serious indictable offence – whether sentencing judge failed to consider alternatives to full-time custody – whether sentencing judge decided how sentence was to be served before fixing the term of the sentence – failure to approach matter in two stages not indicative of error where alternatives to full-time custody were rejected after proper consideration
SENTENCING – appeal against sentence – whether head sentence for offence to which Form 1 was attached was disproportionate to fixed term sentences for other offences charged – no error where sentences were wholly concurrent and where a fixed term should be regarded as the non-parole period – whether the sentencing judge failed to award a discount for pleading guilty in respect of two of the offences – no error where sentencing judge considered the offences together when discounting the plea
SENTENCING – appeal against sentence – whether sentencing judge erred in assessing objective criminality by finding that the offences involved a 'significant degree of planning' – no error in circumstances where specific goods were stolen to fulfil work orders received by the applicant's business – sentence imposed not manifestly excessive – seriousness of offending balanced against strong subjective case – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s112 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 21A, 45 Cases Cited: Attorney General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146; [2002] NSWCCA 518 Douar v R [2005] NSWCCA 455 Laycock v R [2017] NSWCCA 47 Mcintosh v R [2015] NSWCCA 184 Moore v R [2016] NSWCCA 185 Parente v R [2017] NSWCCA 284 Paul Campbell v R [2018] NSWCCA 87 R v Dunn [2004] NSWCCA 346 R v Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 17 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Karina Lorraine Fitzgerald (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Lange, C Parkin & E Olivier (Applicant) F Veltro (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate