NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Warwick (No.33) [2018] NSWSC 1219 Hearing dates: 16 July 2018 Date of orders: 16 July 2018 Decision date: 09 August 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Garling J Decision: (1) Copy of Family Court file admitted.
(2) Evidence of Justice Garry Watts permitted to be led. Catchwords: EVIDENCE – criminal proceedings – opinion evidence – where witness is a Family Court judge with extensive prior experience as a solicitor – where witness was personally involved in Family Court proceedings relevant to the present criminal proceedings – where witness had not adopted the Expert Witness Code of Conduct in UCPR Schedule 7 – witness otherwise qualified by his training, study and experience to provide an opinion on the conduct of family law proceedings – opinion evidence admissible under Evidence Act, s 79
EVIDENCE – hearsay – whether file from previous Family Court proceedings should be admitted – where Crown case on alleged motive is linked to Family Court proceedings – business records exception – Evidence Act 1995, s 69 – evidence also relevant for a non-hearsay purpose – Evidence Act 1995, s 60 – file admitted as evidence – order made limiting use to non-hearsay use – Evidence Act 1995, s 136
EVIDENCE – whether evidence of various Family Court judgments should be excluded – Evidence Act 1995, s 91 – where judgments are relevant for another purpose Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 Family Law Act 1975 Supreme Court Act 1970 Supreme Court Rules 1970 Uniform Civil Procedure (Amendment No 82) Rule 2016 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Australian Medic-Care Company Ltd v Hamilton Pharmaceutical Pty Ltd (No.4) [2008] FCA 1038; (2008) 170 FCR 9 Averkin v Insurance Australia Ltd [2016] NSWCA 122; (2016) 92 NSWLR 68 Chen v R [2018] NSWCCA 106 Dasreef Pty Limited v Hawchar [2011] HCA 21; (2011) 243 CLR 588 Lewis v Nortex Pty Ltd (in liq) [2002] NSWSC 1083 Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles [2001] NSWCA 305; (2001) 52 NSWLR 705 Peter Hillig in his capacity as liquidator of ACN 092 745 330 Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) & Anor v Battaglia & Ors [2018] NSWCA 67 R v Adams (No 5) [2016] NSWSC 1563 R v Warwick (No.24) [2018] NSWSC 691 Vitali v Stachnik [2001] NSWSC 303 Wood v The Queen [2012] NSWCCA 21; (2012) 84 NSWLR 581 Texts Cited: Not Applicable Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: The Crown Leonard John Warwick (Accused) Representation: Counsel: K McKay / G Christofi (Crown) A R Conolly / E Ramsay (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate