NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: ZHC v ZHP [2018] NSWCATAP 190 Hearing dates: 5 April 2018 Date of orders: 07 August 2018 Decision date: 07 August 2018 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: M Schyvens, Deputy President M Harrowell, Principal Member A Lowe, General Member Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: APPEAL – appeal of decision of the Guardianship Division – review of an enduring power of attorney – decision to treat as an application for financial management – appeal on a question of law – whether finding that the attorney was in breach of her fiduciary obligations was legally unreasonable – duty not to mix the property of the principal with the attorney's own property – whether there was a failure to take account of the views of the person subject of the application – appointment of family member as manager and undue conflict of interest – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 80(2)(b) Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW), ss 4, 4(e), 25G, 25M, 25M(1), 25R Powers of Attorney Act 2003 (NSW), ss 36, 36(1), 50(3); cl 14(1)(b) of Sch 6 Cases Cited: Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139C v W [2015] NSWSC 1774 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 DHQ v DHR [2018] NSWCATAP 128 F v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2017] NSWSC 1319 Holt & Anor v Protective Commissioner (1993) 31 NSWLR 227 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499 John Prendergast & Vanessa Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1985-6) 162 CLR 24 P v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2015] NSWSC 579 Re Buckley [2013] WTLR 373 SAB v SEM [2013] NSWSC 253 Texts Cited: G E Dal Pont, Powers of Attorney, 2nd ed 2011, LexisNexis Butterworths Category: Principal judgment Parties: ZHC (Appellant) ZHP (First Respondent) ZHD (Second Respondent) NSW Trustee an Guardian (Third Respondent) Representation: M Adams (Separate Representative for ZHP) File Number(s): AP 17/53531 Publication restriction: Disclosure of the names of the appellant, the first and second respondents is prohibited. A reference to the name of a person includes a reference to any information, picture or any other material that identifies the person or is likely to lead to the identification of the person Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Guardianship Division Citation: Not applicable Date of Decision: 4 October 2017 Before: R L Bailey, Senior Member (Legal)A M Matheson, Senior Member (Professional)L Porter, General Member (Community) File Number(s): 2017/00196607
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate