NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Brigham v Canterbury–Bankstown Council [2018] NSWLEC 1406 Hearing dates: 25 - 26 July 2018 Date of orders: 07 August 2018 Decision date: 07 August 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dixon SC Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: APPEAL- development application for alterations and additions – proposal exceeds the maximum floor space ratio under cl 4.4 of the Canterbury – Bankstown Local Environmental Plan- adequacy of the applicant's clause 4.6 written request to vary development standard – whether compliance with the standard is unreasonable and unnecessary in the circumstances of the case Legislation Cited: Canterbury Local Environmental Plan 2012 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Cases Cited: Four2 Five Pty Ltd v Ashfield Council [2015] NSWCA 248 Four2 Five Pty Ltd v Ashfield Council [2015] NSWLEC 90 Four2 Five Pty Ltd v Ashfield Council [2015] NSWLEC 109 Randwick City Council v Micaul Holdings Pty Ltd [2016] NSWLEC 7; Wehbe v Pittwater Council [2007] NSWLEC 827 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Callantha Brigham (Applicant) Canterbury-Bankstown Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R O'Gorman-Hughes (Applicant)
Solicitors: Mills Oakley (Applicant) A Seton, Marsdens Law Group (Respondent) File Number(s): 17/383422 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate