NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Potkonyak v Legal Services Commissioner (No 2) [2018] NSWCA 173 Hearing dates: 5 April 2018 Decision date: 08 August 2018 Before: Beazley P at [1]; Payne JA at [203]; Simpson AJA at [204] Decision: Appeal dismissed with costs Catchwords: OCCUPATIONS – legal practitioners – appellant found guilty of professional misconduct in respect of his conduct of proceedings under the Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 (NSW) – appellant removed from roll – whether Tribunal should have considered proper interpretation of the Act – whether Tribunal denied appellant procedural fairness by failing to consider appellant's evidence and submissions – whether Tribunal failed to give adequate reasons – whether Tribunal should have permitted appellant to adduce evidence regarding prior complaints – whether there was a reasonable apprehension of bias on the part of the Tribunal Legislation Cited: Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 (NSW), ss 90, 91 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 62, Sch 5 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 99 Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW), s 562 Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW), ss 496, 497, 498, Sch 4 Professional Conduct and Practice Rules 2013 (NSW), rr 3, 4, 5 Revised Professional Conduct and Practice Rules 1995 (NSW), Advocacy Rules 23, A.36, A.37 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 48, 75A Cases Cited: Akins v National Australia Bank (1994) 34 NSWLR 155 Bechara v Legal Services Commissioner (2010) 79 NSWLR 763; [2010] NSWCA 369 Clyne v New South Wales Bar Association (1960) 104 CLR 186; [1960] HCA 40 Department of Family and Community Services re GKD (Children's Court of New South Wales, unreported, Magistrate Murphy, 26 April 2013) Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337; [2000] HCA 63 Ellis v Law Society [2008] EWHC 561 Ex parte Lenehan (1948) 77 CLR 403; [1948] HCA 45 Griffin v Council of the Law Society of New South Wales [2016] NSWCA 364 HK v Director General, Department of Family and Community Services (District Court of New South Wales, unreported, Balla DCJ, 7 August 2013) JL v Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services [2015] NSWCA 88 Konstantinidis v Council of the Law Society of New South Wales [2018] NSWCA 59 Law Society of New South Wales v Walsh [1997] NSWCA 185 Lawrence v Gunner (No 3) [2016] NSWCA 18 Legal Services Commissioner v Potkonyak (No 2) [2017] NSWCATOD 134 Louise v Director General of Community Services [2011] NSWSC 1646 Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992) 175 CLR 1; [1992] HCA 23 McCann v Parsons (1954) 93 CLR 418; [1954] HCA 70 New South Wales Bar Association v Cummins (2001) 52 NSWLR 279; [2001] NSWCA 284 New South Wales Bar Association v Evatt (1968) 117 CLR 177; [1968] HCA 20 New South Wales Bar Association v Meakes [2006] NSWCA 340 Potkonyak v Legal Services Commissioner [2018] NSWCA 1 Preston v Green (1944) 61 WN (NSW) 204 Re Felicity (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 1561 Re Felicity; FM v Secretary, Department of Family & Community Services (No 4) [2015] NSWCA 19 Re Felicity; FM v Secretary, Department of Family & Community Services (No 3) [2014] NSWCA 226 Smith v New South Wales Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 256; [1992] HCA 36 Tjiong v Tjiong [2012] NSWCA 201 Walter v Council of Queensland Law Society Inc (1988) 77 ALR 228; [1988] HCA 8 Weaver v Law Society of New South Wales (1979) 142 CLR 201; [1979] HCA 35 Wentworth v New South Wales Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239; [1992] HCA 24 Ziems v Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales (1957) 97 CLR 279; [1957] HCA 46 Category: Principal judgment Parties: George Potkonyak (Appellant) Legal Services Commissioner (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: In person (Appellant) C A Webster SC; P A Maddigan (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate