NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: A2 v R; Magennis v R; Vaziri v R [2018] NSWCCA 174 Hearing dates: 23 – 25 October 2017 Date of orders: 10 August 2018 Decision date: 10 August 2018 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL; Ward JA; Adams J Decision: In respect of each appellant: 1. Appeal against conviction allowed. 2. Conviction quashed. 3. Verdict of acquittal entered on all counts. Catchwords: CRIME – conviction appeal – female genital mutilation – appellants A2 and Magennis convicted of offences of female genital mutilation contrary to Crimes Act s 45(1)(a) – appellant Vaziri convicted of being an accessory to those offences – appeal allowed
EVIDENCE – application for leave to adduce new evidence – new expert evidence sought to be adduced by appellants – whether necessary that new evidence is "fresh" evidence – whether new evidence relevant – leave granted to admit new evidence as evidence demonstrating a potential miscarriage of justice
CRIME – miscarriage of justice – whether miscarriage of justice on account of new evidence – new undisputed evidence of visibility of tip of clitoral head in both complainants C1 and C2 – demonstrates potential miscarriage of justice
STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – Crimes Act s 45(1)(a) – meaning of "otherwise mutilates"
STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – Crimes Act s 45(1)(a) – meaning of "clitoris"
STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – extrinsic material – whether reference to extrinsic material permissible to determine context and purpose of offence provision
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate