NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Dimis v Commissioner for Fair Trading, Department of Finance, Services and Innovation [2018] NSWCATOD 129 Hearing dates: 17 July 2018 Date of orders: 17 July 2018 Decision date: 17 July 2018 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: D Dinnen, Senior Member Decision: The Respondent's decision is affirmed Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – merits review - Home Building Act 1989 - Contractor Licence – 'fit and proper person' – criminal convictions - referee statements Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunals Act 2013 Crimes Act 1900 Home Building Act 1989 Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 Borovina v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2007] NSWADT 80 Cooper v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2016] NSWCATOD 15 Grenfell v Director General Department of Finance and Services [2013] NSWADT 57 Hughes and Vale Pty Ltd v The State of New South Wales (1955) 93 CLR 127 McEvoy v Director General of the Department of Fair Trading [2000] NSWLEC 183 Poytress v Director General, NSW Fair Trading [2015] NSWCATOD 100 Saadieh v Director General, Department of Transport [1999] NSWADT 68 Saleh v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2015] NSWCATOD 68 Sobey v Commercial and Private Agents Board [1979] 22 SASR 70 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michael Dimis (Applicant) Commissioner for Fair Trading, Department of Finance, Services and Innovation (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Keystone Lawyers (Applicant) NSW Fair Trading (Respondent) File Number(s): 2018/00138057
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate