NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Warwick (No.34) [2018] NSWSC 1242 Hearing dates: 8 August 2018 Date of orders: 08 August 2018 Decision date: 08 August 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Garling J Decision: Permit the Crown to lead the evidence of Detective Sergeant Harkins as set out in his statement signed 17/1/2018, except that I do not permit the Crown to lead, as part of the evidence-in-chief of Detective Sergeant Harkins, the following parts of his statement dated 17/1/2018: (a) section E comprising paragraphs 30-48 inclusive; and (b) all attachments to the statement from immediately after page 22 to the end of the report. Catchwords: EVIDENCE – opinion evidence – exceptions – expert opinion – admissibility of blood pattern analysis evidence – witness qualified in blood pattern analysis – Evidence Act 1995, s 79 – consideration of relevance and probative value of the evidence – where opinion evidence was of significant probative value and not outweighed by prejudicial effect – opinion evidence admitted
EVIDENCE – real evidence – demonstrations – visual appearance of blood quantities on horizontal surfaces – where demonstrations were not relevant due to absence of quantitative evidence tendered – demonstrations not admitted Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: Dasreef Pty Limited v Hawchar [2011] HCA 21; (2011) 243 CLR 588 R v Warwick (No.2) [2017] NSWSC 1225 R v Warwick (No.21) [2018] NSWSC 654 Texts Cited: Not Applicable Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: The Crown Leonard John Warwick (Accused) Representation: Counsel: K McKay / G Christofi (Crown) A R Conolly / E Ramsay (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate