NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Matter Technology Ltd (administrators appointed) v Mrakas; Mrakas v Matter Technology Ltd (administrators appointed) (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 1245 Hearing dates: 3 August 2018 Decision date: 10 August 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Order that the defendants' notice of motion of 19 July 2018 be dismissed with costs. Order that the plaintiffs' costs in these proceedings be specified pursuant to s 98(4)(c) of the Civil Procedure Act at $230,000. Order that defendants pay the plaintiffs' costs of its notice of motion of 2 May 2018. Catchwords: PROFESSIONS AND TRADES – lawyers – duties and liabilities – solicitor and client – retainer – existence of retainer – whether plaintiffs' solicitors authorised to commence proceedings – whether proceedings should be dismissed by reason of want of authority
CORPORATIONS – directors and officers – authority and powers – whether sole director entitled to give instructions to commence proceedings – whether there was an emergency for the purposes of the plaintiffs' constitution
COSTS – party/party – Court's discretion – whether gross sum should be specified under s 98(4) of the Civil Procedure Act – where recovery of costs unlikely – where defendant now acting for himself - where assessment of costs likely to be vexed Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedures Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (No 2) (1995) 57 FCR 119 Colquhoun v District Court of New South Wales (No 2) [2015] NSWCA 54 Hadid v Lenfest Communications Inc [2000] FCA 628 Hamod v State of New South Wales [2011] NSWCA 375 Harrison v Schipp [2002] NSWCA 213; (2002) 54 NSWLR 738 Matter Technology Ltd v Mrakas; Mrakas v Matter Technology Ltd [2018] NSWSC 507 Pham v Enterprise ICT Pty Ltd; Pham v Sebie (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 22 Zepinic v Chateau Constructions (Aust) Ltd (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 99 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Matter Technology Ltd (administrators appointed) (First Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) Matter IP Pty Ltd (Second Plaintiff) Christopher Mrakas (First Defendant/Cross-Claimant) (in person) Platipus Foundation Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J J Hutton (Plaintiffs/Cross-Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate