NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Attia v Health Care Complaints Commission [2018] NSWCATOD 131 Hearing dates: 25 and 26 July 2018 Date of orders: 14 August 2018 Decision date: 14 August 2018 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: The Hon F Marks Principal Member J Zwart Professional Member R Samimi Professional Member A/Prof P Macneill General Member Decision: (1) The application is dismissed (2) This order is not to be reviewed until after a period of 12 months from this date (3) The applicant is to pay the costs of the respondent assessed in default of agreement. Catchwords: Pharmacist-application for review of cancellation of registration- held applicant did not demonstrate appropriate insight, contrition or remorse – application dismissed – costs order made. Legislation Cited: Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Poisons and Therapeutic Goods Regulation Cases Cited: Health Care Complaints Commission v Attia [2016] NSWCATOD 167 Haber v Health Care Complaints Commission [2018] NSWCATOD 16. Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mina Attia (applicant) Health Care Complaints Commission (respondent) Representation: Applicant self-represented, and later by Counsel : T Flaherty (applicant) L Fernandez (respondent)
Solicitors: Michael Flaherty Solicitor (applicant) Health Care Complaints Commission (respondent) File Number(s): 2018/00111564 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate