NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd v Bridge [2018] NSWCA 183 Hearing dates: 4 July 2018 Decision date: 17 August 2018 Before: Leeming and Payne JJA at [1]; Emmett AJA at [38] Decision: 1. Appeal allowed in part.
2. Set aside the judgment entered on 19 December 2017 in the amount of $769,381, and in lieu thereof enter judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $577,035 (being 75% of the amount earlier ordered).
3. Otherwise dismiss the appeal.
4. The appellant to pay two thirds of the respondent's costs of the appeal. Catchwords: NEGLIGENCE – occupier's liability – customer slipped and fell on wet surface of supermarket carpark – whether risk of harm was foreseeable – where store manager had described wet carpark as incident waiting to happen – whether risk of harm could be identified by reference to injury sustained
NEGLIGENCE – contributory negligence – plaintiff slipped and fell when attending to his mobile phone – primary judge found no contributory negligence – challenge to findings that responding to mobile phone was momentary inattention with no causal connection to slip – appeal allowed in part and finding of 25% contributory negligence made Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 5B, 5C, 5D, 5R Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1965 (NSW), s 9 Suitors Fund Act 1951 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 75A Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 51.53 Cases Cited: Agresta v Agresta [2010] NSWCA 330 Avopiling Pty Ltd v Bosevski; Avopiling Pty Ltd v The Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer [2018] NSWCA 146 Erickson v Bagley [2015] VSCA 220 Garzo v Liverpool / Campbelltown Christian School [2012] NSWCA 151 Goode v Angland [2017] NSWCA 311 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; [1959] HCA 8 Joslyn v Berryman (2003) 214 CLR 552; [2003] HCA 34 Kuhl v Zürich Financial Services Australia Ltd (2011) 243 CLR 361; [2011] HCA 11 March v E & M H Stramare Pty Ltd (1991) 171 CLR 506; [1991] HCA 12 McLean v Tedman (1984) 155 CLR 306; [1984] HCA 60 Meakes v Nominal Defendant [2011] NSWDC 9 Nominal Defendant v Meakes [2012] NSWCA 66; 60 MVR 380 Nominal Defendant v Rooskov [2012] NSWCA 43; 60 MVR 350 Perisher Blue Pty Ltd v Nair-Smith (2015) 90 NSWLR 1; [2015] NSWCA 90 Podrebersek v Australian Iron and Steel Pty Ltd [1985] HCA 34; (1985) 59 ALJR 492 Port Macquarie Hastings Council v Mooney [2014] NSWCA 156; [2014] Aust Torts Rep 82-172 Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales v Dederer (2007) 234 CLR 330; [2007] HCA 42 Southern Colour (Vic) Pty Ltd v Parr [2017] VSCA 310 Sungravure Pty Ltd v Meani (1964) 110 CLR 24; [1964] HCA 16 Uniting Church in Australia Property Trust (NSW) v Miller (2015) 91 NSWLR 752; [2015] NSWCA 320 Verryt v Schoupp [2015] NSWCA 128; 70 MVR 484 Vincent v Woolworths Ltd [2015] NSWSC 435; [2015] Aust Torts Rep 82-215 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd (Appellant) Larry Kenneth Bridge (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G Watson SC with D Weinberger (Appellant) I D Roberts SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate